You may feel you somehow lost money and that you are somehow a loser for not making more money, even if you will still net hundreds of thousands of dollars from the sale!
Maybe you harbor this secret thought, “I should have sold my home at the peak. I would have made more money.”
Where would you live?!
If you bought another home at that time, it’s price would have also been at it’s peak, and today you would be in the exact same situation.
Don’t forget that when you buy at the peak of the market your selection of homes stinks. You have to take what you can get. You have to make tons of compromises on the features, location, etc. of the home.
Maybe this thought has flashed across your mind, “I should have sold at the peak, rented and then bought at the bottom.”
Are you nuts!
For that strategy to work;
1) You would have to sell at the top of the market.
There is a helluva a difference between knowing homes are over-priced and knowing when you are at the top of the market.
Many of the economists who today say home prices are too high, have been saying the same thing for years. Sure, they may have been right back then but if you listened to them in 2003 and sold your home, you made a big mistake.
The famous economist Robert Shiller said London home prices were too high in 2003 (?) and they were. Prices declined for a bit and then bounced right back up to still higher levels.
You may think it is rational to sell/rent/buy but the housing market is often irrational and those irrational spots will eat up your rational strategy and spit it out.
2) You would have to buy at the bottom of the market.
Good luck with that, too.
3) Prices would have to fall at least 10%.
When you sell your home, it will cost you perhaps 8% in selling costs - real estate agents, title insurance, escrow fees, etc. Years later when you buy your new home, it will cost you perhaps 2% in buying costs - mortgage costs, title insurance, escrow fees, etc. If you just keep the same home, you wouldn’t have those expenses.
So, between the time you sell and the time you buy, home prices would have to fall 10% for you to break even.
This does not include the cost of moving twice, the disruption to you and your family and the fall in your work productivity during and possibly after the move.
The average correction in recent decades has been 17 percent, when a correction does indeed take place.
4) You will have to put your life on hold until the market bottoms out.
“I’m sorry honey, I know you want to get married [have children, have more children, stop renting, move to a better neighborhood, move to a better school district, have your mother move in, etc.] and buy a home but I can’t buy a home until I know the market has bottomed out. My sell/rent/buy strategy is more important to me than living my life.”
Other disadvantages
It doesn’t make any sense to improve your landlord’s property. If you own the property you can turn it into your dream home.
When you rent, you don’t have the family stability of owning a home. Your lease may not be renewed.
When you own a home, you are in control of how you improve the home and when you choose to move.
Too Clever By Half
In a previous post, I gave the example of an economist in Washington D.C. who sold his home in 2004 because he knew the market was way too high. Unfortunately for him, he badly mis-timed the market. Prices peaked in 2006 at 38% higher than when he sold! We had a once in a generation bull market for real estate and he missed out on it, big time.
It is extremely unlikely that prices will ever fall 38%. When you add the 10% transaction costs, you see his decision to sell with the idea of buying another similar unit later was a financial disaster.
My guess is that if he ever decides to buy a home, he will badly mis-time that purchase as well. He might throw the entire sell/rent/buy strategy out the window when he gets married and wants to own a home for family and quality of life reasons.
The “Property Ladder” Strategy
The traditional, tried and true “property ladder” strategy is far, far, far more successful.
Buy a home as soon as you can swing it, even if it isn’t your dream home.
If home prices appreciate, which is the normal state of affairs, you aren’t priced out of the market for your future dream home because your current home is also appreciating. If you hadn’t bought that first home, you could have been priced out of the market for your dream home.
If home prices fall, which is very unusual, you are no worse off. What you “lose” when selling your current home, you gain back when you buy your new lower priced dream home.




{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
W.C. Varones 11.26.07 at 7:59 am
Ha! Keep pumping as house prices keep dropping! I’m sure you’ll talk some suckers into not selling.
eternitus 11.26.07 at 12:42 pm
I’m not looking to pick a fight here, but I have a few issues with the above…
1. You would not have to sell at the top of the market and buy at the bottom of the market (prices can even go up and you can still break even)… even if the market remains the same, and you save $25k by renting over a couple of years, you come out ahead. Every dollar the house goes down in price is only an added bonus.
2. I’m surprised you pointed out the 10% transaction costs… it is a good point, but it also shines a light on how bad an investment housing really is. A first time buyer has to gain 10% just to break even after fees are accounted for. To keep up with inflation, over 7 years (21% total), you would need the house to appreciate 31% to break even. House prices have gone up about 4% per year over the long term… that means most people, after paying all of their fees, can expect to come up with a 3% loss when inflation is factored into the whole housing deal.
3. I don’t see how renting puts your life on hold… you get to live somewhere either way.
4. The concept of being priced out of the market is a bit ridiculous… especially if you make a decent income. If most people (assuming you fit into the most category) cannot afford homes on an ongoing basis, eventually prices will correct to a point where this is possible for you. If this doesn’t happen in an acceptable time frame… it’s a big country and there are lots of opportunities out there.
Russ 11.26.07 at 5:43 pm
“4) You will have to put your life on hold until the market bottoms out.”
Hmm. . .
I sold my house in metro Phoenix in Fall ‘05 and have rented a house in the same area since that time. My old house model can be purchased now for 30% below the peak price, which my house set by a couple of grand.
You know, my life has not been on hold. In fact, I see little difference in my lifestyle. My bank account is much larger than before I sold, although Bernanke is doing his best to devalue those dollars.
I will buy another metro Phoenix house, but I feel less of a desire to do so now than I did in ‘06. Even my bearish sentiments appear to have underestimated the extent of the Phoenix housing bust. Maybe in ‘08 or ‘09.
As for school districts, if public schools are your thing, it appears to me that it would be far cheaper to rent a place in the most desirable government school districts than to purchase there at still-inflated prices.
sb 11.27.07 at 4:40 pm
Dear Mr. Wake, you seem to be under the impression that renters do not get married or have children or do anything at all (”put your life on hold”). Where did you get that idea?
ww 03.22.08 at 7:48 am
That would be the ideal situation. But like with stocks no one really knows when it has reached the top or bottom. Look at what the analysts tell? Do they ever give any timely advise? One could assume the opposite of what they say.
Under the market circumstances, it might be better to sit it out and wait for few years before selling. It will be wise to check the neighbourhood and avoid listing if there are numerous homes already on sale. Renting it out fully or partially might be a better option. But, one needs to be cautious to whom it is leased. I have visited few rental dwellings when we had to find an apartment to move to from our house (after entering in contract and before closing). I was really shocked at how badly tenants could damage the property! Perhaps renting few rooms college students could actually help reduce the monthly burden to mortgage companies.