Roundup - Subprime mortgage “Teaser Freeze”

by John Wake on December 8, 2007

USAToday has a nice, quick explanation of the plan.

The Bush administration, banks, bond firms and mortgage servicers rolled out a proposal Thursday to help people with higher-cost adjustable-rate subprime mortgages more quickly and easily refinance or modify their loans — including freezing interest rates at the initial teaser rate for five years.

This Forbes piece is generally negative about the plan but she was the first place I saw “freezer-teaser” so she gets points for creativity.

And she had the wisdom to quantify how many would be effected by the freeze.

According to analysis by Barclays Capital, the “freezer-teaser” plan applies to just 240,000 subprime loans. The Mortgage Bankers Association reports the number of subprime adjustable rate mortgages at 2.9 million.

It also won’t help the 16% of subprime borrowers who are already delinquent or in default, and it won’t help millions of other homeowners who either will be deemed able to pay the higher rates when they adjust, starting in January, or who have the unhappy circumstance of having a house worth less than their mortgage or a loan that has already reset to the higher rates.

Which, of course, leads to complaints the program is too small, this one in San Diego.

However;

The plan likely will have the biggest effect in neighborhoods already hard hit by foreclosures. Subprime borrowers tend to be clustered, said Raphael Bostic of the University of Southern California’s Lusk Center for Real Estate.

“They’re not randomly distributed,” he said. “There is going to be a concentration of them. That would equate to a flooding of the market if they all go belly up at the same time.”

[Please notice, "Subprime borrowers tend to be clustered." Just because entry level homes in Queen Creek have crashed in price does not mean prices will crash on a luxury home in North Scottsdale. There just aren't a lot of bank foreclosures in North Scottsdale to drive down prices.]

The Wall Street Journal has a very complete article with several cool graphs but it goes off discussing who will be the winners and losers.

I don’t see any losers in this voluntary program… just subprime holders that will be jealous that they weren’t included. [The way things are headed, subprime interest rate freezes will become a new "human right" by the end of next week.]

2007-12-08-wsj-graph.png

The deal won’t provide relief to many subprime-mortgage holders: These include borrowers who are now in foreclosure, have already refinanced their homes or are more than 60 days delinquent on more than one payment over the past year. In some cases, people with good credit scores will be excluded. Also left out are those deemed able to afford the higher interest rates scheduled to replace their introductory rates over the next two years.

The initiative could help stabilize falling home prices and rising foreclosure rates, buoy the mortgage market and provide a modicum of comfort to investors watching the housing crisis bleed into the broader economy.

But it also sets what promises to become a battle line as the subprime crisis plays out over the coming election year. Some critics, especially Democrats, say the plan doesn’t go far enough to protect vulnerable homeowners against foreclosure.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1

Cbass 12.08.07 at 1:50 pm

John,

What is up with the teaser rate? With the teaser rate you are not paying any principle and in many cases may be accumulating negative equity correct? So I really do not see how this is going to help some home owner in a neg-am loan to continue to pile on debt on the back side of their loan for another five years. After another 5 years then what happens to the balance, is the loan then ammoritized over 20 years? This sounds like the sticker shock will be worse in 2012 for these folks. Sounds like we are not concerned about the homeowner but the markets to me. Can you tell me if I understand the consequences for the borrower correctly or not?

2

John Wake - Real Estate 12.08.07 at 2:53 pm

I doubt the program applies to neg-am, variable payment loans.

Correct me if I’m wrong.

3

Cbass 12.08.07 at 8:53 pm

Any mortgage brokers out there care to clarify what the bailout will actually mean for a homeowner who can qualify for it?

4

Dwest 12.30.07 at 10:10 pm

The feds cannot legally (read the constitution) freeze rates or otherwise abbrogate a legitmate contract. Of course the congress with the help of the SC doesn’t pay attention to the constitution anyway so who knows what might happen. If the big boys want to gamble on mortgage bonds let them pay just like in Vegas.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Older post: It’s either a breakthrough or a misplaced decimal point

Newer post: Save the date - Black Sphinx Dates